A Result That Cannot Occur in a Fair Election

Nevada’s certified Cast Vote Record (CVR) displays statistical patterns so extreme they exceed a 12-sigma deviation — a probability on the order of one in a decillion.

Put simply:

The sequence of ballots certified by Clark County is mathematically incompatible with ordinary human voting behavior or logistical randomness.

In a fair election:

• ballots from different precincts interleave over time,
• partisan ratios stabilize in large samples,
• and preference trends fluctuate mildly around known baselines.

In Nevada’s CVR:

• partisan and issue preferences move in lockstep across hundreds of thousands of ballots,
• independent contests exhibit parallel trajectories,
• and deviations grow larger as sample size increases—exactly the opposite of what the Law of Large Numbers predicts.

These patterns do not suggest voter preference.
They indicate structural interference with the vote-counting process itself.

The State’s Response Was Not Transparency—It Was Erasure

Once litigation was underway—challenging both the statistical impossibility of the CVR and the legality of certification—the State did not preserve the evidence.

Instead, Nevada:

• authorized and executed system updates that overwrote CVR-linked artifacts,
• did so during active state and federal litigation,
• despite clear federal and state law requiring 22-month retention of election records,
• and then offered no opposition when sanctions were sought for that destruction.

The State’s posture has been avoidance, not accountability.

Rather than confront erasure on the merits—what was overwritten, when, and under whose authorization—the defense avoided developing any adversarial record that could fix responsibility or preserve remaining artifacts. The result is predictable: the evidence disappears first, and the dispute is then framed as unprovable.

The Courts Did Not Stop It

Courts exist to preserve rights when the political branches fail.
Here, the opposite occurred.

Emergency motions warning that evidence would be destroyed were denied.
Briefing was delayed past known destruction deadlines.
After the records were wiped, motions establishing spoliation were dismissed—without addressing the governing law.

The result was predictable and irreversible:

• the evidence is gone,
• verification is impossible,
• and the certified election can no longer be meaningfully audited.

This is not mere error.
It is judicial enablement of evidentiary destruction in an election contest.

Why This Is a Constitutional Crisis – Not a Partisan One

This case is not about parties or candidates.
It is about whether self-government is possible without verification.

An election that cannot be audited cannot be confirmed.
An election that cannot be confirmed cannot legitimately be certified.
And a system that destroys the evidence needed for voter oversight ceases to be republican in form.

The U.S. Constitution guarantees every state a Republican Form of Government.
That guarantee fails when:

• election outcomes are produced by unobservable processes,
• records required for oversight are erased,
• and courts permit the destruction to stand.

That is not democracy with flaws.
That is the breakdown of constitutional self-rule.

What the Nevada Record Now Establishes

The record—not allegations—shows that:

• The certified CVR reflects engineered structure, not random human voting.
• The State destroyed election records while under a legal duty to preserve them.
• The courts allowed that destruction, eliminating the possibility of verification.
• Voters were left with a certified outcome that cannot be independently examined.

When an election cannot arise from a fair process,
and the evidence needed to test it is erased,
the conclusion is unavoidable:

The election was not fair.

Whether one uses the word rigged or not, the constitutional meaning is the same:
structured processes interfered with the vote count, and the people were denied their guaranteed role in self-government.